I have many concerns in regards to the educational system
and its history of educating students of color, particularly African Americans,
Latinos, and Native Americans. I am not overly concerned with the terms used to
describe the situation; although I do see the difference in referring to the
issue of disproportionate numbers of minority youth not having access to high
quality learning opportunities as “educational debt” as opposed to the “achievement
gap”.
What I wonder about the most are the intentions of the
people who make the decisions regarding public education. I wonder if they
really believe that they are doing what is best for all children, if they are
only concerned with what happens to a certain segment of the population, or if
they care at all about any of the youth their decisions impact. I wonder if
getting caught up in arguing about the semantics of the phrases used to
describe the issue is an intended distraction from the issue itself; I also
wonder if popularizing the use of the term “educational debt” instead of “achievement
gap” would cause anyone to act any differently.
When I hear people say things like, “I use the term ‘achievement
gap’, I do it because I’m so use to saying it”, it makes me think about people’s
actions, and how much of what they do is based on how they have been more or
less conditioned to think and act in a certain way.
You would think that many decisions that do not seem to have
the best interest of the youth in mind could be justified by simple economics.
But the cost estimates from the Closing the Gap: Early Childhood Education
article on the ASCD website state otherwise, noting that “conservative
cost-benefit models show that for an initial investment of roughly $15,000 per
child, the return to society was roughly $250,000, or $17 for every dollar
invested” (Nelson).
The only reason that makes even the slightest bit of since
as to why the public is not strongly advocating for investing in early
childhood education is that are simply not aware of the cost advantages of
doing so. You would like to think that the welfare of children should be enough
motivation, but it obviously is not since the current system is operating as it
has been for years with little resistance. I will do my best to help change
that by spreading the word about the benefits – both social and economic – of investing
in children’s education early on.
Great thinking here. I do think that you are right to ponder action vs. language. While I do think that how future teachers understand the implication of the language they use, it is critical that they also move on to actions. I suppose I sit on the idea that language choice shapes how you see the world. (You point out the folks that have never really thought about the meaning behind "achievement gap." I see this is why it is important to surface this.)
ReplyDeleteBut, you are right. Now what? How do we move this forward? If we understand the impact and influence that fully funding early childhood education would have and yet still do not do it, we can see how structural racism still functions.
Thank you so much for your thoughts.